tj/uh-wm
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Improve test expectations consistency (UAT)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Thibault Jouan 2015-04-28 09:28:38 +00:00
parent ace86cf0e3
commit 01d9bdb3b3
2 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
features/cli/run_control.feature
View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Feature: run control file path CLI option
Scenario: specifies run control file path
Given a file named uhwmrc.rb with:
"""
puts 'run control evaluation'
puts 'testing_run_control'
"""
When I run uhwm with option -f uhwmrc.rb
Then the output must contain "run control evaluation"
Then the output must contain "testing_run_control"

10
features/run_control/layout.feature
View File

@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ Feature: `layout' run control keyword
"""
class MyLayout
def initialize **options
puts "testing_rc_layout_#{options.inspect}" if options.any?
@options = options
end
def register *_, **options
puts "testing_rc_layout_register"
def register *_
puts "testing_rc_layout_#{@options.inspect}"
end
end
"""
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Feature: `layout' run control keyword
layout MyLayout
"""
When I run uhwm with options -r./my_layout
Then the output must contain "testing_rc_layout_register"
Then the output must contain "testing_rc_layout_{}"
Scenario: configures a layout class with options
Given a run control file with:
@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ Feature: `layout' run control keyword
layout MyLayout.new
"""
When I run uhwm with options -r./my_layout
Then the output must contain "testing_rc_layout_register"
Then the output must contain "testing_rc_layout_{}"